How Cachar College Principal Siddhartha Sankar Nath Rigged Exam-Process to Let Family Members Cheat!

Explosive allegations have surfaced implicating Cachar College Principal Siddhartha Sankar Nath in a shocking case of academic deceit, ingeniously plotted to favor his own kin. The scandalous revelation came to light when two students were apprehended red-handed by a vigilant district magistrate, brazenly cribbing notes during a crucial examination, all while conveniently ensconced within the sanctuary of the sickroom.

Upon interrogation by the district administration, the duplicitous duo confessed to receiving illicit aid directly from none other than the Principal himself, thereby unmasking a web of deceit meticulously spun by the very custodian of academic integrity.

As the specter of disgrace looms over Cachar College, the District Administration is diligently assembling a comprehensive dossier to dispatch to the august Ministry of Education, Government of Assam. This sordid affair marks yet another blot on the escutcheon of Principal Nath, who had previously courted suspension for egregious infractions during a recruitment examination, only to find himself ensnared anew in the labyrinth of malfeasance during the Assam Higher Secondary Education Council’s culminating examination.

Adding a familial twist to this sordid saga, the implicated students are none other than the direct progeny of Principal Nath, one being his nephew—a scion who shares his hearth and home—and the other, a maternal cousin of his nephew.

While the events of that fateful day offer a glimpse into the sordid machinations at play, it is the labyrinthine path leading to the examination hall that lays bare Principal Nath’s modus operandi. Pertinent inquiries now beckon:

Why was the sickroom surreptitiously relocated to an office space in such close proximity to the Principal’s sanctum?

Despite a staggering maintenance fee of approximately Rs 16 lakh allocated for CCTV surveillance, why did the cameras in question languish in a state of dormancy, conveniently blind to the nefarious activities within?

Furthermore, why was a professor, ranking ninth in seniority, handpicked as the Assistant Officer In Charge of the examination center, while eight more seasoned individuals were inexplicably overlooked?

And perhaps most damning of all, how can we reconcile the presence of the Principal’s own flesh and blood in the examination hall, especially when he is a subject matter expert and his family member is taking the test?

Yet, looming larger than any singular query is the ominous uncertainty regarding the allegiances of the unseen powers that be. Will they continue to extend their cloak of protection over Principal Nath, thereby affording him free rein to desecrate the hallowed precincts of education with impunity?